Home

Advertisement

Customize
About this Journal
Format change for those few who use my actual default view. I'm using this section to maintain a list of topics to address so I don't forget.

-The nature of narrative (context and choice)
-Roleplaying is a skill
-Truth and the observer
-Design: Caper, Trust and Betrayal, Empire, and CQB.
-Use of props to control physical space.
-Gamelang orchestra and the restrictions of pure percussion.
-Close-loop roleplaying and what it offers (all good things must come to an end)
-Segregation and education, why legislate this morality?
Current Month
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930
Nov. 17th, 2006 @ 06:43 pm Technology rocks
I know that some of you are using Pandora already. For those who don't know, Pandora is the primary output of the Music Genome Project. The group analyzes music and rates it on various scales (tempo, key, more esoteric stuff). You put in a song you like, and Pandora will search its database for other, similar songs. Which is pretty dang cool if you ask me. One of the cool things about Pandora is that it's simple. You put in your starting song and Pandora automatically builds a 'radio station', which is basically a giant playlist, of related songs. Plug in a song, sit back and listen.

Here's a similar thing I just found OWL Multimedia. OWL is even more interesting. Take an mp3 on your hard drive, any mp3. Plug it into the Java applet they provide. Select a ten second (or so) snippet of the song that you really like. The applet then does a wave form analysis and runs it through their database comparing it to wave forms from other songs. It then provides a list of songs that utilize high-similarity wave forms.

Basically the system finds other songs that have parts that sound like parts of songs you really like. That is dang cool. I love technology.

Thomas
About this Entry
Jul. 12th, 2006 @ 10:41 am Book of the future?
I was reading Henry Jenkins' blog yesterday, and he had a post on the state of academic publishing. It was a pretty interesting piece, but the best part is that he had a link to GAM3R 7H30RY. It's a book, but online. And not just online, but set in an incredibly easy-to-use format. It is extremely cool. I've just started playing with it, but the possibilities it suggests are pretty exciting. Especially since this is the work-in-progress copy, and plans are that it will eventually see print, and hopefully be better for the open discussion.

Thomas
About this Entry
Apr. 18th, 2006 @ 04:44 pm Untapped teaching tools
The last couple of days I've been devoting actual time and effort to playing around with Sketchbook Pro. Now, I already knew (since [info]allovernow told me) that it was a cool program, and it helped you draw better, but it turns out that it does more than that: Sketchbook teaches and motivates you to draw.

Not that it has any awesome tutorials or anything like that. No, instead it is simply an incredibly powerful and easy-to-use sketch environment. Some of you may remember that I have a paper sketchbook. Generally I found it a bit arduous and somewhat discouraging to draw in it, and I felt like I was learning rather slowly.

But I started playing around with Sketchbook Pro, and it has three features that kick the crap out of normal paper:

1. Color. Being able to draw guide-lines and basic shape-sketches in a light green or red (instead of just in a lighter shade of pencil) is a way bigger deal than I would have thought.

2. Layers. Sweet flying coyote, layers are amazing. I can put those guide-lines on a layer and then make them disappear at will! I can experiment with color layering and all sorts of other cool things. I can also erase lines that lie really close together with perfect precision as long as they're on different layers.

3. The undo option. By far the biggest deal. I make a bad line and instead of imprecisely erasing it (and making my sketch all ugly and smear-y) I can just make it as if it had never happened. I'll do two, five, ten lines before I get one I actually like. Since I can be relied upon to make at least one stroke in 10 that makes me hate the sketch. When I was doing stuff on paper this ended up being really discouraging and made me not want to draw.

So, this is all a really long-winded way of saying: it is so totally awesome how new tools for doing a task can make it more accessible. The internet lets me learn to cook exotic food, my tablet PC lets me learn to draw, and so on. This is straight-up exciting to me. In ten years will I have software that makes it super-easy for me to make my own animated short films? Design cool video games? Learn new musical instruments?

I guess ultimately I wanted to say: "I'm sketching again and it is good", and "while it is expensive, a tablet is a huge help to me in learning to draw, maybe it would be for you too?"

Thomas
About this Entry
Nov. 25th, 2005 @ 08:09 pm Christmas comes early
Yeah, today's Black Friday. The day that everyone spends way more money than they have on stuff they don't need. And I am no exception.

Best Buy had a lovely deal going: Seagate 120GB 7200RPM drives for $30 after rebates. That's $0.25/GB with a five year warranty. I figured, what the heck, and grabbed five of the things. Got my bundle home and the rebate is "one per household", so I'm now farming those things out. I went ahead and gave [info]allovernow one because, hey, I know she needs more storage. I've got commitments from my sister and my father to do rebates for me, so that leaves me with one floating. If you: A) Are willing to fill out and send (at my expense) the rebate forms for one of these or B) Have a desire for one of the drives themselves let me know. I'm willing to part with one if you'll use it for awesome.

Thomas
About this Entry
Oct. 18th, 2005 @ 07:33 pm A new economy
I was thinking about some comments made by [info]cpxbrex. Nothing in particular, just some general points on socialism. The point is, I think that we (the human race/society) are moving into a fascinating new form of economy. Or at least an interesting expansion of "current" economic principles.

Now, disclaimer time: I don't have a significant background in macro-economics or anything like that, so it's possible that I'm just spouting nonsense. Anyway, here's the basic idea I'm thinking: the rapid expansion of low-cost, stored (that is, not real-time) global communications technology (the internet) and fairly readily available global package delivery technology (though this isn't fully mature yet) allow for people to cater to niche markets that are too thinly spread to be targetted via traditional means.

My big example is the Forge, or at least Forge games (see also CheapassGames). These are games which have an appreciable global market (as in, say, 20,000 customers globally) but in which the market is to dispersed for traditional distribution models to be effective and/or profitable. This is because the market is to unique to be lumped into a general distribution system.

Now, general distribution systems are great for reaping economy of scale effects, but they're terrible for handling things that don't lend themselves to economy of scale effects. Traditionally part of the distribution model has also been marketting, which is interesting in itself.

Now, with the advent of cheap, global, asynchronus communications technology people have formed communities around their niche activities. These are, as earlier stated, too dispersed to be catered to by giant economy of scale utilizing systems, but are well prepared for directed products.

The big cost at the moment is in transport. This is unfortunate because, for the time being, it makes shipping anything other than light goods and information more expensive than most niche markets can support (we won't, for example, see much of a market in concrete speaker boxes despite their excellend accoustic characteristics because the shipping costs are so high).

The point: it's looking like the developing (and hopefully continually developing) technologies involved here are making it more and more feasible for people to get out of the Giant Corporate Dependency thing. Not that corporations are necessarily bad, but they don't really provide well for those who want to do something a bit offbeat (roleplaying design for exmaple) or those who want to supplement their income through hobby production. Further, the lack of truly viable alternatives has made the corporation an over-powered entity in the economic market.

The above is highly rambling, but I think that I may be poking around something that is pretty interesting: the impact of modern communications and transportation technology on nich economies. Maybe someone's doing research on that stuff? If so, and you know about it, I command you to inform me!

Thomas
About this Entry
Jul. 28th, 2005 @ 09:57 pm Technophilia
Tags:
Well, looking at the money, I've decided not to get a projector right now after all.

Why? How could I forsake such a technological wonder? The answer is simple my friends... 700 Watts of Dolby 7.1, and a brand new set of mid-range Yamaha speakers. That little package plus a 27" flat screen tube will still come in $500 less than an XGA projector. The television will be a stop-gap, but this receiver should hold me down for at least 5 more years.

With that in all out in the open, I now have a favor to ask. I need a piece of audio to christen this setup with. It can be anything that can be obtained in digital form. I'll go through the list, pick one, and that's what I'll use. If your entry is picked I'll come up with some special prize for you, likely of the baked persuasion. Keep in mind that this is going to need to be something that can push the barriers of my new system. For those who don't know, 700 watts + 200 watts of sub-woofer are pretty powerful. However, driving base won't win you the prize. I need to test the full range of this thing: dynamics, pitch, and rythm. Right now I'm leaning toward a nice piano solo, but I could be persuaded in another direction...

Thomas
About this Entry
Jul. 15th, 2005 @ 04:51 pm Wiki
I finally did it. I bought some webspace and threw a wiki on it. Hopefully there'll be more there eventually, but at the moment it's just the wiki.

I mentioned working on an empire management game. Well, it's made it into the wiki now.

Also, this is for Will since I know he's been wanting one, there's a Trithofar section too. It's empty at the moment, but feel free to go crazy with it.

Anyone else who needs some wiki space, well, let me know. I'm still learning my way around PmWiki, but so far I've been very pleased with it.

Thomas
About this Entry
Jun. 19th, 2005 @ 09:11 pm The final stretch, and: Oh! Look at that! BitTorrent!
Man, I'm very, very worn down. I thought I knew what I was getting into with 5 straight 60 hour weeks, but I was a bit optimistic I think. Not that I'm complaining, at least not anymore than I usually do. In fact I think the experience has been, over all, a positive one. The accellerate class structure has been good for Intro to Logic, and excellent (if a bit intense) for my Lit class. And, really, I think my problem with Italian isn't so much one of compressed learning as it is that I don't devote enough time to vocabulary accumulation.

And now there are only five class days left. Now that it's down to the home stretch I feel as if I've got my second wind. I'll try to post something actually interesting about my experiences when it's all over.

Every once in a while I step back and look at what a brilliant piece of software Bit Torrent is. I won't go into all the details of the basic design, but BT is at its core a file distribution protocol. A brilliant one. In brief: When you are connected to the internet you basically are connected via a divided highway. Data flows in both direction, and it's pretty much capped in both directions. But just because you're using all of your download capacity you are not necessarily using all of your upload capacity, in fact most of the time you're using almost none of it. Bit Torrent takes that upload capacity and feeds it into a "swarm" of other people downloading the same file. The system automatically provides you with priority based on how much you're giving back into the system.

What all this does for you is that it sets up a system in which the more people you have downloading the file, the more total bandwidth you have available for people who want to download the file. It's a very elegant system.

Personally I think that Bit Torrent is the future of the networking in general. If not Bit Torrent itself, then something that looks very much like it. Here's how: You make this totally sweet music file, but you don't have enough bandwidth to just throw it out on the internet for hundreds of people to download. So you set up a .torrent. Then the more popular the file is, the more available it becomes.

Now, imagine this very same technology applied to web browsing. As long as you have a page open you could also be providing access to that page. Now imagine that all of this is done in the background. You basically get a massive boost in bandwidth effeciency since as long as you're using the network you're also providing access to the network. Now combine that with truly ubiquitous computers... Ah!

Also, for those who don't know: it is peach season. You should eat some peaches, for they are marvelously tasty.

Thomas
About this Entry
Jun. 12th, 2005 @ 01:06 pm I like technology
Tags:
I'm currently considering taking the significant check that the power company is going to send me to replace all of my electronics and rolling a good portion of it into a projector. At the moment I'm seriously considering the Hitachi CP-X340W. It's right at the upper end of my price range, it's 1024x768 native (an absolute minimum since I'm going to be using it to replace my monitor as well as my television), it runs up to 720p (that's 720 pixels high for progressive scan), and it has component inputs (another requirement since I am replacing my television with it).

The two major problems I have with it are its relatively low contrast ration (400:1) and its throw ratio. Throw ratio is the size of the picture based on the distance from the projection surface. I've only got about 9 feet to project across, and the throw ratio is 1.5:1 at its best, so I'm looking at about a 72" or so diagonal. My other option is another Hitachi that's about $100 cheaper that mounts a wide angle lense that allows for a 1.3:1 throw ratio, but it has an even lower contrast ration (300:1).

And so I come to the intarweb thinking that just maybe someone who reads my journal knows something about this kind of thing. Anyone? Talk to me. Would I be happy with a 300:1 contrast? Will even 400:1 make my eyes bleed?

Thomas
About this Entry
Jun. 10th, 2005 @ 10:38 am Network strangeness
I've been having some really strange network issues the past couple of days. It's been an off-and-on thing for about a week and a half, but it's gotten especially bad recently. Basically, when I use my WiFi card my computer will randomly crash. Sometimes I'll have hours of problem-free activity; sometimes the machine starts up, connects to an access point, and locks up. This has made it frustrating to update, and made for an infuriatingly troublesome session of Mike's HeroQuest game for me. Hopefully I didn't ruin anyone else's fun, but dang it frustrated me. I've been playing around with my network settings today, and I'm hoping that I've fixed the problem. If I don't crash over the weekend at all I'll assume that I got it fixed.

Of some interest: my Logic instructor was incredibly frustrated by something at the beginning of class today. He made a minor (but key) mistake while explaining the semantic truth table for the PL function "&", and to vent he through a piece of chalk across the room. It was kinda funny really.

In still other news: I took the time to watch one episode from the Gunslinger Girl DVD I bought me the other day. I really must say that I'm torn. The voice acting is actually pretty good, and manages to not be over-the-top. Unfortunately any localization work can break down at any number of points, and the weak link here is the translation work.

I guess it's at least partially financial, though I have a terrible (and cynical) suspicion that the translaters just don't have a sense for the dramatic. It's probably some combination of the two. In all honesty, Gunslinger Girl deals with some very mature themes, but the translation does its best to avoid them or gloss over them. This is not a good thing, and it's probably my primary complaint.

But there's more! Gunslinger Girl makes excellent use of silence and visuals to set scenes up, but the translation team (or someone) apparently decided that this was too subtle. So now there are these dialogue explanations of what's going on instead of the elegant implications that were used.

Still, I do love the series, and I will finish the disc out (and buy the others too), but this is really reinforcing my desire to learn Japanese. It's also reinforcing the importance of good translation in the conveyance of serious themes in media.

Ah, well...

Thomas
About this Entry
Jun. 2nd, 2005 @ 09:00 pm A momentous occasion!
Today marks the first ever gmail spam filter failure I've experienced. I got this totally awesome message that I am saving for posterity, and including here for the curious.

But because it's not really that interesting... )

Wow, wasn't that exciting?

Thomas
About this Entry